Yearly Archives: 2009

Say goodbye to 30-day closings due to new regs

As if the closing process was not difficult enough already, a new set of Truth in Lending  (TIL) and appraisal regulations went into effect on July 30 and the end result will be slower closings. In the past, a lender could rush a mortgage application and close in as little as two weeks. Now, I predict that it will be difficult, if not impossible, to close in less than 30 days.

The new regulations slow things down by requiring the following:

1. Prohibits lenders from accepting payment for the loan application until a new good faith estimate of fees, now called an “early disclosure,”  is given to the buyer.

2. There is now a 7 day waiting period after the early disclosure is given that must expire before closing can occur.

3. A final TIL is then mailed 3 days before closing. If this baby increases by more then .125% from the early disclosure, then the lender has to start over and give you a new 7 day waiting period to think it over. That will be fun when the buyer has his moving van packed!

4. The appraisal must also be sent to the client 3 days before closing.

Lenders are terrified of the TIL laws in general and, believe me, they will follow these regulations to a T. Lenders are afraid of TIL lawsuits because if they lose the case, they pay heavy duty damages, attorney’s fees and costs.

I am already getting calls from lenders on the day that they take an application asking for the buyer’s title charges. This is easy to estimate, but it will further slow down the process while lenders wait for seller’s attorney to call them back with the fees. I put together a simple google spreadsheet that estimates buyer’s title fees.

Ken Harney has a good summary of the new regulations. And here is an interesting, if slightly technical, presentation from Wells Fargo on how it all works.

Supreme court gives retirement plan to ex-spouse

Couple is married and Mr. makes Mrs. the primary beneficiary of his retirement account.

Mr. & Mrs. get divorced.

Mr. does not change his beneficiary and then dies.

The U.S. Supreme court recently ruled in Kennedy Estate vs. Plan Administrator for DuPont Savings that the ex-spouse gets 100% of the retirement plan because the beneficiary designation trumps the divorce decree .

Moral of story: Always update your beneficiary designations for retirement plans, especially after a divorce.

Google maps to the real estate rescue

This add-on for google maps is a little hard to find. When you open google maps, there are two search boxes. Click the second box and a drop down list appears. Select real estate. Then type in whatever address you are interested in in the first box. A map with red dots representing properties for sale near that address will pop up. Then you can use street view to zoom in and see how the neighborhood looks. Chicago magazine wrote about it recently, so it must be cool.

How to get $8k tax credit asap

This year, most closings are first-time buyers. They are eager to get the $8000.00 tax credit for first-timers. This is a pretty simple process.

To get the $8000.00 tax credit you can either amend your 2008 tax return or wait to file your 2009 tax return. Since most first-buyers were picked clean of available cash at closing,  they amend their 2008 tax return to get the refund right away.

To amend your 2008 tax return, you will need:

1. A copy of your 2008 tax return;
2. Form 1040x, which is the amendment form;
3. Form 5405, the form that indicates that you are a first-time buyer who has joined the land-owning gentry.

If you type “1040x” or “form 5405” into google the forms pop right up. In the attached, I show how to fill out the form. This assumes that the client is single and the adjusted gross income is under $75,000.00.

The refund takes about 6 to 8 weeks to process.

5405example

1040xhouse

FHA buyers can get downpayment from IL

Illinois will offer $6,000.00 interest free loans that can be used as a downpayment by first time buyers.

Details of the program are here.

The $8000.00 tax credit given to first time buyers has been popular and has helped get first time buyers rolling. I did a closing the other day where my client/buyer had already filled out his 1040x (to amend his 2008 tax return) and had it ready to mail in from the closing. That’s thinking ahead. But, the $8000.00 tax credit comes 4-6 weeks after closing and can’t be used for the downpayment. The new Illinois loan program will provide downpayment advances for FHA loans (FHA requires 3.5% down).

Anything that props up the housing market for awhile is good by me.

Seller & attorney approval: Beware of killing contracts

The attorney approval clause included in real estate contracts lets the attorney  approve, disapprove or make modifications to the contract (other than price) within 5 business days after the contract is signed.

There’s one situation in which the attorney approval clause can be very dangerous. It’s this: Let’s say the Seller accepts an offer from Buyer 1. During the attorney approval period with Buyer 1, the Seller decides to accept another offer from Buyer 2 (almost always for more money than Buyer 1 offered). Seller tells his attorney to “kill” the contract with Buyer 1 under the attorney approval clause.

I don’t have many hard and fast rules in my practice, but here’s one that I do follow: I refuse to kill the contract with Buyer 1 using the attorney approval clause if the sole reason is to get the Seller more money from Buyer 2. The reason I do (or don’t do) this is that there is an implied element of good faith in the attorney approval process and you can’t just toss out Buyer 1 for no reason other than price. It specifically says in the attorney approval clause that modifications to price cannot be made. Plus, killing Buyer 1’s contract just invites litigation.

In the last two weeks, I have had two separate transactions in which the attorney for the Seller tried to kill the contract with Buyer 1. In both cases, Buyer 1 recorded the contract against the property and both parties filed lawsuits in court to stop the Seller from selling to Buyer 2. (I represented Buyer 2 in both cases.)  In the first transaction, Buyer 2 dropped out as soon as they heard of the court fight.  The parties are still sorting out the second transaction. So much for the “slow” real estate market.

Watching these two transaction unfold reinforced my belief that if a Seller uses the attorney approval clause in an aggressive manner like this, he or she is likely to end up in court.

One man's mortgage meltdown

I love the NY Times web site’s most emailed list. It was there that I clicked on a story called My Personal Credit Crisis. The story was actually a book excerpt from Times writer Edmund Andrew’s new book called “Busted: A reporter’s look inside the mortgage meltdown.”

The story goes into excruciating detail of how Mr. Andrews got series of  “liar loan” to buy and then refinance a house, ran up $50,000.00 in credit card debt and used the $10 overdraft protection feature on his checking account almost daily. I would be embarrassed to admit doing some of this stuff, but he doesn’t seem terribly worried about it. Most of the comments by readers on this site are less than sympathetic.

The book provides a rear view mirror look at how easy it was to get “no doc” and “stated income” loans. My favorite part is when he tries to apply for a loan modification with Chase because he can’t make his payments no one from Chase will call him back. When he finally gets in touch with Chase, they can’t help him because he’s not 90 days in default on the loan. Now that’s real life for you.

Stripping of foreclosed homes continues

This story in the Daily Herald talks about how foreclosed homeowners are taking fixtures like copper wire, appliances and toilets from homes before they leave (notice the fireplace torn out of the wall in the picture). The answer to this problem is “cash for keys.” The foreclosing lender offers cash that’s paid after the owner turns over the keys and the property is checked. A Phoenix real estate agent (who’s one gutsy hombre) was charged with selling fixtures from a foreclosed home on Ebay.

Lenders seeking money back after short sale

Short sales of real estate are everywhere now. A short sale happens when there are not enough funds to pay the existing mortgage holder, so the seller and the lender agree that the mortgage can be paid short.

After closing, the shorted lender can either:

1. Issue a 1099 to the seller for the amount forgiven (which is then taxable to the seller as ordinary income, unless it was a primary residence).
2. File a deficiency judgment lawsuit against the seller for the unpaid amount (this rarely happens).

This WSJ story discusses how many lenders are asking the seller in a short sale to sign a promissory note for the amount unpaid in a short sale. Then the lender files suit under the note for the unpaid amount. This is happening primarily in cases where the seller has other assets that can be used to pay the shortage and with investment properties.

I have not had a lender ask the seller to sign a note in a short sale. Nor have I seen a seller sued for a deficiency judgment. So far, lenders have 1099’d the seller for the amount unpaid.

The 1099 can cause a cascade of tax problems. The sellers only relief may be to file bankruptcy to get rid the income from this “cancellation of debt.”